May 09, 2008
Obama and the Jewish Vote
By Richard
Baehr
The Jewish vote in the coming presidential election is up for grabs to an extent
unseen for almost three decades, assuming Barack Obama wins his party's
nomination. And that has got Jewish Democrat activists worried.
An email is circulating in the Jewish community in Chicago from a Democratic
Party operative, containing an
article
written last year about why his party is where Jews belong. Some
of the arguments that are used make the case are that both parties are good
for Israel, so Jews need to look at other things, such as that Democrats
"care" more for people in need. Republican Jews, the author
claims, are either greedy or scared. Such rhetoric flies in the face of the
alleged unity-inducing quality that is often trumpeted as a key appeal of
Obama. By demonizing Jews who support Republicans, Democrat partisans are
merely revealing their insecurities about the bona fides of their presumptive
presidential candidate.
And crime of crimes, the article asserts that the GOP is the party that
brought the Terry Schiavo case to a vote in Congress, thereby mixing church
and state. I have my doubts that the Terry Schiavo case is an issue that will
resonate at the moment with Jewish voters, given Iran's nuclear program
nearing completion (Barack Obama says he'll talk to Ahmadinejad about it),
economic worries (Barack Obama says the solution is to raise taxes and spend a
lot more government money), and the war in Iraq (Barack Obama says get out
now, and leave the locals to fend off Iran and al Qaeda).
As it turns out, Democrats in Congress from Illinois voted 4 to 2 for the
Schiavo legislation. I really have no interest in how Barack Obama voted
on the Schiavo case. I care about his views on Iran, Israel, Iraq, the
economy. It turns out Obama was for the Schiavo legislation (voted for it),
before
being against it (shades of another Democratic presidential
candidate I remember).
The letter that is circulating with the email repeats several times the
results of a totally discredited poll from the 2006 congressional elections
that suggested Jews voted 87% for Democrats that year. The author concludes,
none too subtly, that if the Messiah returns, there is an 87% chance he
will be a Democrat. I never thought about the Messiah in terms of red and blue
before, but then it is not I mixing church and state with my metaphors.
That 87% poll result was based on a survey sample of 200 Jewish voters in the
national exit poll. That is a very small sample size for a national subgroup,
and was not a randomly selected sample. The entire exit poll sample size was
near 13,000. So Jews, who typically represent 3% of the voting population,
were but 1.5% of this national sample. That does not sound right either. In
any case, when I first saw the articles and emails from liberal Jews gloating
about the poll with the 87% figure, I wrote a few pieces (like
this
one) on why the survey was unreliable nonsense. Some of the gloating
emailers who had contacted me agreed and backtracked. But now the
Jewish Democrats are back spouting the poll as fact again. A random
sample of 1,000 Jewish voters were surveyed in three states after the
2006 races, and that showed Jews voted 75% for Democrat! s, 25% for GOP
candidates, almost exactly as they split between John Kerry and George Bush in
2004.
If 25% was too high a percentage of Jewish Republicans for liberal Jews to
stomach, they must really be having heart burn with the new Gallup poll, that
showed that The Democrats' 50 point win over Bush with Kerry is now but a 29
point lead for Obama over McCain (
61-32,
with 7% undecided). In a state like Florida, with about 400,000
Jewish voters in Presidential election years, that is a net shift of about
85,000 votes. John McCain is trouncing Obama in
virtually
every poll in Florida taken to date, and the shift among Jewish voters
seems to be part of Obama's problem in the state. I think given the way some
Clinton voters have told pollsters they were for Obama this year (an average
over-polling for Obama of close to 5% in primary states), my guess is that
many of the ! undecideds are really McCain voters, and so are some of the 61%
who say they are for Obama.
McCain could break the modern day GOP high water mark of 39% set by Ronald
Reagan against Jimmy Carter in 1980, which was before Carter's venomous
attitude towards the Jewish state was so evident. A shift of that magnitude
could make a difference in Pennsylvania, a state Kerry won by only 2.5% in
2004, and in which Obama was soundly beaten by Clinton in the recent
primary. There are over 200,000 Jewish voters in Pennsylvania.
None of this is surprising. Jews who care about Israel have many reasons to
have concerns about Barack Obama, pretty much all of which have been laid out
in the
American Thinker in a series of exhaustively researched
articles by
Ed
Lasky. Of course, some Jews do not care about Israel very much, and those
Jews can find a comfortable home in the Democratic Party, where support for
Israel is far lower than among Republicans overall in
every
national survey that has been taken comparing the parties on this
issue.
In any case, with Obama a risk on Israel and untested in matters of national
security and foreign policy, and with the Republicans offering John McCain, a
long time strong supporter of the US-Israel relationship and a man, whose
entire career provides a definition of the words "tested" and
"experienced", it is no wonder that those Jews who choose this year
to finally vote Republican will have a lot more company than they might have
in the past.
Richard Baehr is chief political correspondent of American
Thinker.